Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Garland's avatar

I thought this might help other readers. Your mileage may vary, this was a quick pass over a long poem.

Epigraph: The mind can be overwhelmed by meaning.

I. Bruegel’s tower, like the tower of Babble, is a symbol of ambition and folly, here is described as a kind of Borgesian hall of mirrors, self-referential, unresolvable, built incrementally but every layer misunderstands the last. “The right hand / will never know the left.”

II. Reworking of part of Eliot’s 4 quartets where he describes natural cycles, which are benign, but forgetting is part of this natural cycle, to appreciate the spring like a deer, we have to constantly remember spring. Again, knowledge is ineffectual.

III. An inevitably perspectival take on the failure of the Tower. Prophet 1: the Tower keeps dominating more of human culture, and shutting us off from nature, like our cellphones! Things will fall apart. Prophet 2: People will fight over the tower, which now, seems like religion, one of many manifestations of human imagination. Even the iconoclasts will end up creating more towers, so the one Tower will become ever more diverse. Prophet 3: Get to work, be reasonable, sounds like the Enlightenment, but later in the poem will be seem as Biblical.

IV. The tower (here, human culture) seems to be complete, so leaves no space for regeneration. But there could be something there! Just keep looking in the nooks and crannies.

V. A cold wind threatens apocalypse. We give up our projects. What was the tower in the first place? We continue building, the past is devastated, hope is gone, but wasn’t it always like this? An almost Ashberian tonal switch.

VI. Now post-apocalypse, if the apocalypse is the collapse of the tower, here civilization. Is it useful to rebuild? Maybe it was always corrupt? People are too quick to answer here. But they’re jerks! There really was something in the past, and we are merely aping it, zombielike. We live among “This ruinous debris of all our yearning.” Yearning matters to Charbonneau.

VII. Political question of distribution and justice should be periodically set aside for renewal. Every purpose under heaven has its time. Amen. Also, we don’t know where we come from or where we are going, just do your work.

VIII. Wisdom? We don’t get the vastness of God and his creations. Reason and justice and toil just lead to contradictions. Time and chance happen to all, good and bad. The mad die without expecting or wanting anything else. But what about the ideal? This is a sermon—live joyfully with your pretty wife while you can! Do what you can do! Proverbs!

IX. We should tend our souls like a house. Build it and live in it. It’s really good sometimes. Forgiveness is key. This is a continuation of last section’s sermon, but it’s just notes, provisional now. Not as heartfelt, in fact a retreat the will culminate in X's strange reversal.

X. The workshop is abandoned, nature has taken over. Is that work as in “your limited thing you have to do,” or the call of the Tower or human imagination and rejection of limits. Who knows! Only repetition remains, but is it repetition of a ground truth or a repetition of all that yearning that led to the folly of tower. Maybe the next poem will answer these questions. We end with a fire in the furnace, the “sublime imagination.” Stevens for the win! Is this like the end of a dialectic Blake poem, where the cycle (or turn of the swirling floors of the Tower) begins again? Which would imply that the folly of the Tower is recurring, even just part of who we are.

Daniel Bishop's avatar

I struggled with the first stanza, but man, this was a rewarding read. The juxtaposition of the tower narrative and the Qoheleth outlining the seeming futility and purposelessness of everything that happens "under the sun" really highlights how knowledge-accumulation failed to make humanity rational. But then the poem's final section: maybe, just maybe, we can build something better. Here's to hoping.

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?